Listen to the latest episode of the *Resilience2Redemption* podcast, where several prisoners share their concerns about parole eligibility calculations and the application of EDGAR Rule 217.690

Image is a courtesy of Unsplash
Madeline M. Carthen, a prison chaplain, advocate, and host of the podcast, has a message she would like to share with John Mosley, the Director of Probation & Parole for the Missouri Department of Corrections. She spoke with great concern for the well-being of prisoners in Missouri and requested a discussion about how their time is calculated.
Some may be familiar with her previous interviews, including one with infamous inmate Reginald Clemons, who is currently fighting to overturn his parole denial.
Here is what she wrote:
Dear Director Mosley,
I hope this email finds you well. My name is Madeline-Michelle Carthen, and I serve as a 30 year volunteer Chaplain with a deep commitment to the spiritual well-being and rehabilitation of incarcerated individuals. Through my work, I have had the privilege of engaging with many individuals who earnestly seek to reform their lives and contribute positively to society upon their release.
Recently, several prisoners have voiced concerns on the *Resilience2Redemption* podcast I host weekly. There are many prisoners who gave an interview regarding the calculation of their prison sentences, particularly in relation to parole eligibility.
Many have expressed confusion and frustration about being required to serve additional years—sometimes as many as five or ten—before beinreconsidered for parole. These concerns seem to stem from varying interpretations and applications of EDGAR Rule 217.690.
Podcast:
Resilience2Redemption
https://open.spotify.com/show/5V0TX4iXk0y6zDHbsQTwqf?si=d081a096ec3849cf
While I understand the complexities of such policies, these issues
highlight the need for clarity and consistency. Providing prisoners
with full disclosure about how their cases are calculated in
accordance with the law not only ensures transparency but also fosters
trust in the correctional system. Furthermore, it aligns with the
Department’s mission to uphold justice while promoting rehabilitation.
I respectfully request an opportunity to discuss these concerns
further with you or your designated representative. My goal is to
advocate for a review of the application of Rule 217.690 and to
explore how the Department might address these misunderstandings to
better support the individuals affected.
Your leadership in addressing these matters could provide much-needed
reassurance to both prisoners and their families, reinforcing the
Department’s commitment to fairness and accountability.
Please let me know a convenient time for us to discuss this issue
further. I am happy to meet virtually, depending on your schedule.
Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your ongoing
dedication to ensuring justice and integrity within Missouri’s
correctional system.
Sincerely,
Madeline-Michelle: Carthen
Chaplain|Host
To reach Madeline, please email her directly at: resilience2redemption@gmail.com
prisoners, parole, eligibility, EDGAR Rule, Resilience2Redemption, podcast, interviews, sentencing, confusion, frustration
#prison, #parole, #EDGARRule, #podcast, #Resilience2Redemption, #sentencing, #prisoners, #concerns
References:
