After enduring years of wrongful imprisonment, Lamar Johnson takes legal action against the city of St. Louis and the police officers responsible for his flawed conviction.
Lamar Johnson being released from prison custody, after being held wrongfully for decades. St. Louis Post-Dispatch-Credit
In a sad tale of injustice, Lamar Johnson, who endured nearly three decades of wrongful imprisonment for a 1994 murder, has taken legal action against the city of St. Louis and the police officers responsible for his flawed conviction. Released last year after a judge vacated his conviction, Johnson’s fight for justice continues as he seeks unspecified damages for the violation of his constitutional rights.
Johnson’s ordeal began in 1995 when he was convicted of murdering Marcus Boyd and sentenced to life in prison. For years, he tirelessly submitted appeals and petitions, all to no avail. It wasn’t until 2019 that the St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kimberly M. Gardner’s office revealed misconduct by the lead detective, bringing national attention to the case.
The turning point came in 2022 when Gardner’s office petitioned to vacate Johnson’s sentence. A team of dedicated attorneys presented compelling evidence in court, exposing the coercion of a key witness and highlighting Johnson’s reliable alibi, placing him miles away from the crime scene. Shockingly, another incarcerated individual, James Howard, admitted to being the actual perpetrator.
In a momentous decision, Judge David C. Mason found clear and convincing evidence of Johnson’s innocence, marking his release and vindication after 28 long years. However, Johnson’s battle for justice didn’t end there. His recent lawsuit alleges unconstitutional misconduct by the city, police, and the prosecutor’s office, holding them accountable for his wrongful arrest and conviction.
The lawsuit emphasizes the irreversible harm inflicted upon Johnson and the violation of his constitutional rights during the flawed investigation. Despite his exoneration, Missouri’s compensation policy for wrongful convictions presents a challenge. While the state typically compensates exonerees based on DNA evidence, Johnson’s release was granted due to a judge’s determination of his innocence, leaving him without financial restitution from the state. Johnson’s attorneys assert that the lawsuit seeks both answers and accountability. Emma Freudenberger, one of Johnson’s attorneys, stresses the importance of holding the responsible parties accountable for the police misconduct that caused immense harm to Johnson and his family.
In a statement, Johnson expressed his gratitude for freedom and his determination to make up for lost time. He outlined his plans to raise awareness about wrongful convictions, help others, and move forward with his life. The lawsuit becomes not only a quest for compensation but also a demand for transparency, acknowledgment, and accountability in the face of a dark and painful chapter in Johnson’s life that should never have been written.
